Is School Good or Evil?

Robot in classroom.
Spread the love

Picture Source: My Artwork, Night Cafe. A.I generated. 

Why Are Our Schools Failing?

Amid allegations that our schools have turned into nothing more than veritable cookie cutters for half-baked executives of the future, there are instances of teachers striving for excellence.

Let us look at this question specifically, and also look at it in the light of ESL. So we will discuss the question directly as it stands and also look at it from a few different perspectives.

Firstly I would like to delve into teaching English as a second language or E.S.L.

Is Teaching ESL Cultural Imperialism?

It doesn’t matter how long you have taught ESL, the question normally arises on a night out with a few teachers over a tipple or two. Are we really providing a service or are we perpetuating the cultural dominance of the U.S.A or England? I am going to play the devils advocate and throw the questions (and phrases) into the hypothetical mix, so you can think and answer at your leisure.

  • When English is taught as a second language, it can make English-speaking cultures more dominant and make local languages less important. This can lead to the loss of cultural diversity and fewer people speaking local languages.
  • Teaching English as a global language can make countries that already speak English more powerful in politics, economics, and culture. This can keep existing power imbalances in place and make it harder for other countries to become powerful.
  • When people learn English as a second language, they often learn about Western ideas and ways of thinking. This can make local knowledge and cultural differences less important or ignored.
  • Learning English very well can make people want to be more like English-speaking people and forget about their own language and culture. This can make unique cultural identities disappear.
  • Sometimes, programs that teach English in other countries don’t treat local teachers very well or give them bad working conditions. This can make things unfair and keep richer countries in control.

ESL, Changing Lives For The Better.

And here are the responses to advocate the opposing theory that ESL teaching is not ‘Cultural Imperialism” but is really “Socially Supportive”

  • Communication and opportunity: Learning English can improve your ability to communicate, provide you more access to educational and employment opportunities, and make it easier to collaborate globally, promoting cross-cultural understanding.
  • Individual empowerment: ESL instruction can give people more confidence by giving students the means to communicate clearly in a world that is becoming more interconnected and by enabling them to actively engage in global discussions.
  • Creating a bridge between cultures: Teaching ESL can serve as a bridge between many cultures, promoting understanding, empathy, and respect for various viewpoints.
  • Language preservation: When conducted properly, ESL instruction can coexist with the maintenance and resurgence of regional tongues and cultures, fostering multilingualism and cultural variety rather than eradicating it.
  • Choice among students: Students have autonomy when choosing ESL instruction, giving them the option of participating or not. In this instance, it might be viewed as a voluntary tool for personal empowerment and advancement as opposed to a cultural mandate.

Picture Source; My Artwork, Night Cafe.  A.I generated. 

Opportunities for Schools to Reshape the Future.

There are many parents, especially in the USA who believe the schooling system has lost its way. And I am not talking about E.S.L now, but the common core subjects in a normal public school. It feels like every time I go on to any social media outlet there is a rant against what is happening in the schools. And even though I will be focusing on the USA, I feel like it is a worldwide problem.

So what is happening in the schools in the USA at the moment? The “core curriculum” feels like it is being driven by big business that need workers that are willing to work for “next to nothing” and accept the corporate B.S.

I “Googled up” “Bill Gates” and public education and the headline that came up was “The Savior of Public Schools”. I am very pleased there was a question mark at the end of the headline.

The Savior of Public Schools.

Personalized learning seems to be the buzzword and it doesn’t look unreasonable. However, there are many points I would need to cover first. Not the least being, why have “trade classes” like metalwork and woodwork been removed from the curriculum? ( I am showing my age, but it worked for the students).

Schools used to have “body shops” that provided students who weren’t quite as academically gifted as some, the opportunity to learn a career in building cars and automotive repairs. Then they could step into this job straight after school and it worked.

And “Home Economics” used to be a thing, teaching sewing and cooking and it wasn’t just stereotypically females who enrolled into these classes.

Why were these courses dropped? In hindsight, it can be seen as a bad idea. Those students who weren’t motivated to sit in front of a computer all day were absorbed in learning a trade that they saw could make them money.

Now the same students sit in the computer classes and disrupt them because they are bored. And we blame ADHD and not the education system that is failing them.

Personalized Learning.

This is now what is being promoted as the new shift in teaching. In my opinion, I see nothing new in this and I am amazed we listen to somebody who never invented their own product and only donates to “future business opportunities”.

So this is what is described as “personalized learning”

“As part of the individualized learning paradigm, teachers supervise rather than lecture. They allow children individual work and group-based projects to learn as flexibly (and in as many contexts) as possible with the use of personal laptops and tablets.

Modern technology is expensive, therefore not many schools can afford to use the individualized learning approach. However, when districts do invest in it, the concept has been successful.

According to a report released last year, for instance, many of the students in 62 schools utilizing individualized instruction outperformed their peers in arithmetic and reading. Many people who had scored below average ended up above average”

Source: Rewritten Content from the “World Economic Forum“..

Final Thoughts.

Education is something that will set us free, and it is up to the individual teacher to make the most of what we have, to educate anyone who wishes to learn.

The best way to change the world is to change one person at a time. And by that I mean educate not indoctrinate.

This is by no means my normal type of post, however, I feel like it is something I have to say. Thanks for reading, I hope it gets you thinking. And I mean that in the nicest way possible.

Stephen.


Some links on this site may be affiliate links, and if you purchase something through these links, I will make a commission on them. There will be no extra cost to you and, you could actually save money.  Read our full affiliate disclosure here.

2 thoughts on “Is School Good or Evil?”

  1. Hi Stephen,

    I really appreciate the effort and thoughtfulness you’ve put into exploring these issues. The balance you strike between discussing the potentially detrimental effects of English language teaching and its capacity to be “socially supportive” shows a nuanced understanding of the role that language plays in shaping culture and power dynamics. I agree that we should strive for a system where ESL instruction promotes multiculturalism, respect, and understanding.

    Your exploration of the modern education system, particularly in the U.S., is thought-provoking. The reduction of vocational courses, such as home economics or trade classes, and an increased focus on computer literacy has created a one-size-fits-all approach, which does not cater to the diverse interests and capabilities of students. It’s alarming to think that this might be contributing to the increase in classroom disruption and perhaps even the diagnosis of ADHD in bored students.

    1. Thankyou Anoth, 

      It can be frustrating as a teacher to see upfront what is happening in the classroom and then have to put up with “so-called” curriculum changes made by politicians who have probably never spent 1-day teaching. 

      This blog is for the many teachers who have the students best interests at heart. I have no links to any products or services, however, if you or any others wish to help ESL students, please consider buying products via this website. Or if there are any reviews you want done, send them through.

      Thanks

      Stephen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *